Google+ Followers

Monday, 27 May 2013

Muehlenberg lies again as he seeks to speak for the LGBT community

In the past few weeks we’ve seen France and the UK (well, almost in the latter) legalise equal marriage, and serious discussion start about it in Australia now that Kevin Rudd has shown his support.

Predictably, as Christofascist Muehlenberg and his hate-fuelled right-wing buddies have lost the argument on equality, and no mainstream political parties any longer support their bigoted views; they have turned to outright lies, scaremongering and a renewed witch-hunt against gay people.

Thus Muehlenberg pens an article, in his usual inflammatory and melodramatic way entitled “Death of the Boy Scouts” – why? Because *shock horror* they have voted overwhelmingly to stop excluding gay boys on the grounds of their sexuality. Always one to conflate homosexuality with paedophilia and seek to make a connection and a moral equivalence where there is none, Muehlenberg ends his piece:
The big winners here are the militant homosexual activists, and very soon, the very excited paedophile community.
Nice. Here we have Muehlenberg still refusing to accept that some people are naturally born gay; that it isn’t a choice, nor the result of abuse, grooming or bad parenting. Thankfully the BSA have accepted this reality, unlike Muehlenberg, who declares himself an expert on homosexuality despite not knowing a single gay person. He allows this comment to pass too, as it serves his scaremongering agenda:
I wonder how many of those who would condemn the catholic priests for molesting children under their care would appreciate that this could put children in the scouts in exactly the same danger.
Exactly the same danger? So children are in danger from gay people? Gay people and all Catholic priests want to rape children? What a vile lie from a vile bigot. This is exactly the kind of hate-mongering nonsense Muehlenberg loves to peddle.

He follows up this article with Kate, Sex, Lies and the Truth, which is probably his most hate-fuelled anti-gay lie to date. The story is that an 18 year old bright student, Kaitlyn Hunt, faces charges (presumably statutory rape) after the parents of her 14 year-old girlfriend reported her to the police. Consequently, Kate faces jail time and a lifetime on the sex offenders’ register, where her promising life will be ruined the moment she has turned adult.

The grounds for compassion in her case seem to be that she is only a few years older than her former girlfriend; that the relationship was consensual, and that they were peers, moving in the same circle of friends. Thus Kate’s parents and many of her friends are setting up a campaign to pay her legal fees in an attempt to avoid criminal prosecution. Whether or not they succeed, as Kate has clearly broken the law, is a moot point, and the trial will have to run its course.

If you read Muehlenberg’s angle on it, you would think that gay people were screaming for the legalisation of paedophilia as part of their wicked “agenda”. Let me quote from the bigot-in-chief himself:
"...the homosexual activists have turned Kate into a poster girl – and even a victim – for their cause."
Erm, no they haven’t Bill. What “cause”? What are you even talking about? Evidence that anybody is saying this is a gay rights issue?
“But because this is a lesbian affair, the media as a whole and a homosexuality-drenched West is having trouble finding anything wrong with this. Thus we have yet another clear indication that the granting of special rights to homosexuals simply opens the door to every other sort of sexual perversion – in this case paedophilia.”
What utter drivel and outright lies. Note Bill’s scaremongering tactics in full force: If they let gays marry they’ll legalise sex with your children next. A vicious lie.
“Kate’s own mother has come out wholeheartedly defending the actions of her daughter.”
Kate’s mother a militant LGBT activist, is she then, Muehlenberg? No, thought not.

But as far as Muehlenberg is concerned, this case proves that:
And the lefties and homosexual activists insist that paedophilia has nothing to do with their agenda. Yeah right.
Maybe he’s so blinkered by all-consuming hatred for gay people he simply can’t see that his article has proved nothing of the sort. The “Twitter storm” he talks about has a whole range of people from all walks of life asking for compassion in the sentencing of Kate, because they don’t want to see a young woman’s promising life ruined over an illegal consensual relationship.

Where, Muehlenberg, is there anyone claiming this is a gay rights issue?

Where, Muehlenberg, is there anyone, particularly gay rights groups, using this story to campaign for the decriminalisation of paedophilia?

I am expecting an overwhelming silence to those questions, from Muehlenberg and his coven of bigots; but there will be no retraction. If Muehlenberg retracted all his lies there’d be virtually nothing left on his website.

Saturday, 11 May 2013

The Evil Liar Muehlenberg conflates homosexuality with paedophilia. Again.

Yes, he's at it again. This time in an article called "Time for Equal Love with Children", Muehlenberg deceitfully muddies the waters and pretends that homosexuality and paedophilia are some sort of moral equivalence.

Those who want to see normalised sexual relations with children have been very vocal of late. Of course they have long been making these demands, and they have had a long relationship with the homosexual rights movement as I have documented in my book.
Oh, well if it says so in Bill's best-selling book then it must be true!

He goes on:
But worse yet, there are now many “experts” who are arguing that paedophilia is an innate predisposition and orientation, just like is claimed about homosexuality.
How stupid the phrase "it is claimed about homosexuality".  What Bill's trying to say here is that people choose to be gay and choose to be sexually attracted to children. Anyone with a functioning brain can see how idiotic both contentions are. It presupposes, against all the available evidence, that everyone is born straight and then some, purely to piss of Xtians, "choose" to be gay. And whilst there can be no doubt that people don't "choose" to be sexually attracted to children, it doesn't mean they have to act on those attractions, since children have a right to be protected from adult sexual contact. This is very far removed from two consenting adults of the same sex engaging in consensual sexual relations, despite Billy's best attempts to say otherwise.
We find here the same line used for homosexuals: this is an orientation from which no change is possible. And just as groups like the American Psychiatric Association (APA) were hounded by the militants to change their stance on homosexuality, so too the paedophile activists are trying to do the same thing.
Bill goes on with his stupid line about "choice" and "changing sexualities". As if one could say to a paedophile: "Look, please stop fancying kids, it's not very sociable. Fancy people your own age instead," for the paedophile to say, "Oh, I wish I'd thought of that sooner. OK then." That is how stupid Muehlenberg's 'argument' is. And just like he doesn't understand how scientific knowledge increases over time, he refuses to understand how the same is true for the social sciences. How ludicrous and dishonest to suggest that the APA (and come to it - all pshchiatric bodies in the developed world) no longer classify homosexuality as a mental disorder because they were "hounded by militants". It must have been a bitter blow to bigots like Muehlenberg when psychiatric associations looked at the evidence and declassified homosexuality as a mental illness. "It must be the pesky gays pulling the wool over their eyes," is the best explanation the deluded Muehlenberg can come up with. It can't possibly be that there's simply no foundation for his bigotry.  I'd classify religious belief in educated people as a mental disorder but I wouldn't try to deny them the right to believe what they like, so long as it doesn't stop me living my life in my own way. If only Xtians were half as tolerant as gay people.

That's what Muehlenberg's argument basically boils down to. He's furious that gay people are now legally allowed to get on with living their lives as they see fit, and increasingly with the option to marry. This to him is proof, in his twisted, self-pitying mind, that he is being "persecuted". This is the equivalent of gay people saying, "look at all these idiot faithheads attending church - I don't agree with their convictions, yet still they're allowed to hold them - therefore I am personally being persecuted." Thankfully, most gay people are a lot more sensible than twisted religious bigots like Muehlenberg and are happy to live and let live. If only Muehlenberg and others like him would extend the same courtesy.
So the obvious concern here is this: if paedophilia is just another sexual orientation, must we now accept, embrace and promote it like we now must do with homosexuality?
Where do you even start with such idiocy?
But thanks to the homosexual activists, we now are having a very hard time saying no to any of this. 
As usual in Bill's weird head, everything is the fault of those pesky gays. It's raining. It must be those militant homos at it again.

And in case anyone argues that Muehlenberg doesn't directly say that homosexuality and paedophilia are the same thing or morally equivalent, check out this comment that he allows a free pass:
Why are people surprised? This is the natural end of the homosexual movement. The history of homosexuality is that there is a preference of homosexuals more towards younger males than there is of heterosexuals. This is why they started slowly in introducing homosexuality to try and show it is “normal” and then go where they really wanted, and that is sexual anarchy, which is what we have right now, just that they want more anarchy. 
Bigot Ian Nairn clearly equates and conflates homosexuality and paedophilia - the end result Muehlenberg was hoping to achieve with his vile article.

I thought in Bill's fantasy world liars went to hell? Or if you're deliberately lying for Jesus does it not count?

Shame on Bill Muehlenberg for spewing yet more hatred, ignorance and lies against the LGBT community.