Those who want to see normalised sexual relations with children have been very vocal of late. Of course they have long been making these demands, and they have had a long relationship with the homosexual rights movement as I have documented in my book.Oh, well if it says so in Bill's best-selling book then it must be true!
He goes on:
But worse yet, there are now many “experts” who are arguing that paedophilia is an innate predisposition and orientation, just like is claimed about homosexuality.How stupid the phrase "it is claimed about homosexuality". What Bill's trying to say here is that people choose to be gay and choose to be sexually attracted to children. Anyone with a functioning brain can see how idiotic both contentions are. It presupposes, against all the available evidence, that everyone is born straight and then some, purely to piss of Xtians, "choose" to be gay. And whilst there can be no doubt that people don't "choose" to be sexually attracted to children, it doesn't mean they have to act on those attractions, since children have a right to be protected from adult sexual contact. This is very far removed from two consenting adults of the same sex engaging in consensual sexual relations, despite Billy's best attempts to say otherwise.
We find here the same line used for homosexuals: this is an orientation from which no change is possible. And just as groups like the American Psychiatric Association (APA) were hounded by the militants to change their stance on homosexuality, so too the paedophile activists are trying to do the same thing.Bill goes on with his stupid line about "choice" and "changing sexualities". As if one could say to a paedophile: "Look, please stop fancying kids, it's not very sociable. Fancy people your own age instead," for the paedophile to say, "Oh, I wish I'd thought of that sooner. OK then." That is how stupid Muehlenberg's 'argument' is. And just like he doesn't understand how scientific knowledge increases over time, he refuses to understand how the same is true for the social sciences. How ludicrous and dishonest to suggest that the APA (and come to it - all pshchiatric bodies in the developed world) no longer classify homosexuality as a mental disorder because they were "hounded by militants". It must have been a bitter blow to bigots like Muehlenberg when psychiatric associations looked at the evidence and declassified homosexuality as a mental illness. "It must be the pesky gays pulling the wool over their eyes," is the best explanation the deluded Muehlenberg can come up with. It can't possibly be that there's simply no foundation for his bigotry. I'd classify religious belief in educated people as a mental disorder but I wouldn't try to deny them the right to believe what they like, so long as it doesn't stop me living my life in my own way. If only Xtians were half as tolerant as gay people.
That's what Muehlenberg's argument basically boils down to. He's furious that gay people are now legally allowed to get on with living their lives as they see fit, and increasingly with the option to marry. This to him is proof, in his twisted, self-pitying mind, that he is being "persecuted". This is the equivalent of gay people saying, "look at all these idiot faithheads attending church - I don't agree with their convictions, yet still they're allowed to hold them - therefore I am personally being persecuted." Thankfully, most gay people are a lot more sensible than twisted religious bigots like Muehlenberg and are happy to live and let live. If only Muehlenberg and others like him would extend the same courtesy.
So the obvious concern here is this: if paedophilia is just another sexual orientation, must we now accept, embrace and promote it like we now must do with homosexuality?Where do you even start with such idiocy?
But thanks to the homosexual activists, we now are having a very hard time saying no to any of this.As usual in Bill's weird head, everything is the fault of those pesky gays. It's raining. It must be those militant homos at it again.
And in case anyone argues that Muehlenberg doesn't directly say that homosexuality and paedophilia are the same thing or morally equivalent, check out this comment that he allows a free pass:
Why are people surprised? This is the natural end of the homosexual movement. The history of homosexuality is that there is a preference of homosexuals more towards younger males than there is of heterosexuals. This is why they started slowly in introducing homosexuality to try and show it is “normal” and then go where they really wanted, and that is sexual anarchy, which is what we have right now, just that they want more anarchy.Bigot Ian Nairn clearly equates and conflates homosexuality and paedophilia - the end result Muehlenberg was hoping to achieve with his vile article.
I thought in Bill's fantasy world liars went to hell? Or if you're deliberately lying for Jesus does it not count?
Shame on Bill Muehlenberg for spewing yet more hatred, ignorance and lies against the LGBT community.