This is a question congenital liar and evader Bill Muehlenberg is unwilling to answer or give his view on.
We all know that Bill's a reality- and history-denier, and a fundamentalist who believes, despite the fact it makes him barking mad, that "Adam" and "Eve" were actual real people and the first humans who lives a few thousand years ago (remind me, where did Cain's wife come from again, and exactly how did he found a city?)
But of course when the Polish Pope, the UK's Archbishop of Canterbury and better-educated religionists like them accept the reality of evolution, Bill and his ilk back themselves further and further into a corner in holding out denying it.
The fact of the matter is that anyone with a functioning brain cell can see the obvious truth of evolution and the overwhelming evidence that supports it. Even religious leaders now concede that they have to accept it and try to twist their beliefs around it.
So when Muehlenberg posts implying you can only be an Xtian if you deny evolution (see A Tale of Two Women - Of Faith), then simply asking if the two are mutually exclusive is enough to have you censored. Good honest Bill, who's always seeking to engage in "the truth", runs a mile from the question. He runs because he has to, because he has no credible defence for his views.
If you don't believe me, ask him yourself. Muehlenberg is intellectually dishonest. This is what I asked, for which I received no reply and was censored: