Yes this is war. Of course Islam has declared war against the West for 1400 years now. The only question left to ask is this: will Europe side with its enemies and commit continental suicide, or will it wake up and respond before it is too late?Really, Bill, war? And I'm pretty sure the Crusades were a case of western aggression against Muslims, who were busy living quite happily before they were forcefully invaded by raping, pillaging, murdering Christian thugs. Doubtless had Jihadi Bill been around in the Thirteenth Century he would have been on the front line. Apparently this is truly what Jihadi Bill believes, and nowhere is it plainer that he has granted himself the right to denigrate and attack Muslims than in his post Stand With Brave Heidi Against Creeping Sharia.
In it, he gushes and fawns over a woman called Heidi Mund. Why? Because she charged into an interfaith event designed to foster unity and fellowship between Christians and Muslims, and interrupted an imam's prayers shouting, "I break this curse." Muehlenberg openly admires such bullying and abuse. He doesn't care that this woman's actions spoiled the peaceful event for hundreds of people, nor does he care that she may have ruined any good will between Christians and Muslims who were gathered. No, Bill wants war with Muslims, which is why he makes such strenuous efforts to dehumanize them and persuade his fellow bigots that Muslims aren't entitled to even basic civility.
Interestingly, one of Bill's own, Emma Joyce, has two comments under the article. She raises an interesting and fair point:
...how would you feel if your church service was loudly and abusively invaded by a Muslim yelling that Allah is the one true God (which they believe as truth with all the sincerity of Heidi)? Would you not be horrified and think it the height of bad manners? Would you not expect them to extend you more courtesy than that when you are at worship?Bill's reply drips with his usual anger and haughty arrogance for anyone daring to challenge his opinion, and he even mentions the non-existent 'all out war':
...we have here with Islam a false anti-Christ religion and a political ideology which is raping, murdering and beheading people, and destroying entire Christian communities, yet all some people can do is whinge about “manners”. Sorry, but with priorities like that, no wonder we keep losing, and no wonder the jihadists are making so much progress.You'll notice at once that Bill is bringing jihad, rape, murder and decapitation into a peaceful event, as if Heidi Mund has somehow brought down an act of Muslim terror or a plot against Christians - a complete straw man, if not an outright falsification, in a vain attempt to justify his glorification of hostility against Muslims. He also openly attacks the commenter, accusing her of 'whinging', when all she has done is to ask a perfectly reasonable question that Bill won't answer.
In fact, he refuses to answer Heidi's perfectly reasonable question because he's an intellectual coward. Of course, if a Muslim were to interrupt a Christian service the same way Miss Mund interrupted the Imam, Bill would be at his keyboard until the keys were steaming stating it proves what awful people Muslims are and how they are declaring war against Christians, subverting their right to freedom of religion etc. etc. etc. And he would bang on about it for a week. It's another clear example of Bill Muehlenberg's outright hypocrisy.
Here, in Bill's outright refusal to answer a simple challenge, and to falsely insert 'jihad' into a peaceful situation, we can see very clearly that he doesn't think Muslims are entitled to any courtesy or respect, but he honestly believes they can be treated with hostility and contempt simply because they are not Christian. Bill cherrypicks a few bible verses, as if they give him biblical warrant to bully and abuse anyone who doesn't believe exactly the same as him. It is as contemptible as it is arrogant.
You'll notice that Emma Joyce only has two comments. I wonder if she fell foul of Bill's "three strikes and you're out" rule, which he has stated himself? This translates as, "You have three opportunities to agree with me. If you still challenge my views, I will ban you and censor you." Bill is a bully who hides away from debate and challenge behind shouting louder, hurling abuse and then censorship.
Yet his bullying and abuse should not go unchallenged. He is calling for war against Muslims and stirring up hatred. He is championing a woman who deliberately hijacked and subverted a peaceful interfaith event that any civilised person should endorse. He has made it clear he doesn't want peace, he doesn't want dialogue, he wants Muslims out of the West, or else he will do all he can to stir up war and aggression against a mostly peaceful and assimilating minority, many of whom have left countries ravaged by war.
He's entitled to his view, but when he is endorsing civil disobedience and advocating violence against peaceful Muslims, surely the authorities should be monitoring him?